Thursday 5 June 2014

ACFA: Loans Meant For Farmers



FOL2
Farm Ownership Loans and Farm Operating Loans
These loans are for farmers that are not able to get financing from a lending institution and those who have experienced financial hardship from natural disasters. This program can also be enjoyed by those that need additional funding to maintain profitable farming operations.  This fund is expected to be generated among the farmers group who have voluntarily agreed to work together as a formidable team. Of which (ACFA) is a sole agent.
If other farmers group so wish, they could also take the initiative to key into this program and utilize this privilege to support its members.

Tuesday 8 April 2014

Edo Farmers! Set for Re-Union Program

MAIDEN SPEECH MADE BY MR. AGBONLAHOR OSAMUYI.
THE GENERAL SECRETARY,
ALL CO-OPERATIVE FARMERS ASSOCIATION, EDO STATE.
On the 27th of July, 2013.
In a Special Reunion Meeting Of All Co-Operative Farmers, And Its Affiliates.

My Comrades,
My Brothers,
My Co-farmers,
Every one present here today,

I want to warmly welcome you to this great gathering. I feel very privileged to be a part of this success. I want to assure you here today that it has not really been very easy for real and sincere farmers to come together like this at anytime. But for the hard-work, dedication and determination of this ACFA pioneers.

 "Our mission is to organize, protect and make financial and moral provisions for all our members from being lynch or cheated by our oppressors. We are very sure that no matter how strong or popular our supposed challengers are; ACFA will never give way for any of its members/affiliates, to be victimized".

This All Cooperative Farmers Association, Edo State; started its operation in January 2013, after many farmers has requested from the first pioneer of this group to look for way(s) to address the abnormality and disunity being experienced among them. Listening to these cries and looking for ways to address it, Mr. Agbonlahor designed what is now known as ACFA and presented the plan to the second pioneer who in collaboration with other farmers established what is now known as ACFA. Which now serves as the only farmers group that will ever make meaningful impact in the life of farmers, due to the sincerity and transparency operated in it, part of the founding materials. Why other farmers groups are like a seed yam planted, that need to rotten away for a fresh and better one to germinate from it. In which the new sprout, is ACFA.

Have you not ask yourselves individually at one time or the other why farmers has not been assisted by the various government, and other well meaning Donors? Or why we cannot access what the World Bank, the federal government or other interested international institutions granted for us, is even taken away from us?

The answer is not far fetched. It’s because, Farmers fail to be united.
I want to assure you once again colleagues that the time for all discrepancies to be cleared in now. Please fellow farmers, let us know whether you like what we are doing now, whether you believe in what we are doing now or whether you convincingly want to be a part of this great change we are about to experience in the farming sector.
If you say no to those questions just raised above, quickly ask yourself this personal question “if I choose not to be a bonafide partner in this move to join all farmers together, even when I am aware that this is the solution to our problem, what will I tell my children when they come out tomorrow to ask me, when others were putting in unstinting effort to stabilize the farming industry in the state, why do you allow your slaves to be in charge of your gold “YOUR INHERITANCE” ?.

In agriculture, remember that the new sprout is always better than the one planted. Therefore, affiliating to this Association at its earliest time will put you in advantageous position.
Market women were supported with N100m on Thursday 25th July, 2013 by the comrade governor of Edo State. Will you say they are more organize than us? Are they more than us? Are we saying that our wives who are these market women are more intelligent than us?
I advise every one of us here to change our negative opinion about ourselves. Believe you are a success.  Come together to work as a team. Since this sincere coming together as a co-operative farmers group is what we must do to succeed as farmers. If we fail to do it how, we must definitely retrace our steps later and come back to do it. And by then we may eventually not succeed. My advice is that we better come together now and start enjoying the fruit of our labour. Or else, we will be giving the opportunity to our slave to be in possession of our most cherished GOLD “Our Inheritance”.

I want to ask once again when will you learn comrades, brothers and friends? Have you not made several mistakes before that you can correct yourselves from? If you have not known me by now, since I have been with you, when will you do? Don’t be surprise! Not knowing me till now, shows lack of Intelligence as the only intelligent ones can benefit from the government. But what are some qualities of Intelligence?

Qualities Of Intelligence
1.      Truthful
2.      Determination
3.      Optimism
4.      Focused
5.      Sincere love for others
6.      Non-relenting
7.      Working with others
8.      Transparency
As a dedicated farmer, ask yourself; have you ever make sense out of nonsense? Do you want to make sense out of it? Be very well guaranteed that the rotten yam can never rise to live again after decay. Therefore, because other farmers groups that have existed. Never proved to be real or have better plan for its members, they will never have persons/group to penetrate their root, again.

Take Note:
Stay glued to ACFA. The only farmers Association that knows the feelings and plight of the farmers, and wants to make a open door for them in that regard. The benefit we claimed to have derives from the government in the past was not based on our effort but the effort of others. How then can we claim we are intelligent when no one has ever been privileged to benefit from our effort?
These words I’m telling you today are inspired and promising. If you all adhere to it, this will be the open door for all active and interested farmer in this state. It will mean that the key to the door of success has been given to the rightful owners (the farmers).
With optimism, I tell you no one, no officer, no group or organization can ever have a claim on our inheritance anymore.
I am glad to be with you once again.

I thank you all.

Saturday 1 March 2014

COMBINE FARMING! Workable Tool For Co-Operative Societies.

           Prior to now, farmers in Edo State have no direct access to markets and had to depend on middlemen. Base on this development, ACFA farmers finds it difficult to produce the quantity and quality of food crops they would otherwise have grown. The result is that Produce spoiled due to poor storage and bad roads which hinders smooth transport to the lifting points (FARMS). Although farmers in other countries may have faced similar problem, succor always come in time, either from the government, individuals or company who have a need of the product produced by the farmers or international donors.
A case study is Thailand where farmers faced hectic situation in their farm road. precisely in 1986 a company called Swift Co. Ltd. took a holistic step in comparison to what ACFA wish to begin in Edo State. They organized all farmers together in one settlement and began contracting farmers’ groups to grow predetermined types and quantities of fruit and vegetables. Swift set out to remove other middlemen by guaranteeing a fair fixed price to farmers for each type of produce, to be renegotiated annually. Collection stations were built in the middle of each growing area so that the needed variety of produce could be assembled every day. Weighing and grading are carried out transparently in the presence of the farmers. Refrigerated trucks reduce losses.
Just like the proposed design of ACFA, Groups were run on democratic principles: one member – one vote. Each group elects a management committee that to serve them Members participate in all discussions with Swift Co. Ltd. and can vote freely on all issues. Everyone contributes one percent of his or her income for group funding. Although groups can opt out after an initial three-year contract, no farmers’ group ever grumbled or complained, henceforth.
All Co-operative Farmers Association, wished to remove the middlemen by guaranteeing a fair fixed price to farmers for each type of produce, to be renegotiated annually. Collection stations will be built in the middle of each growing area so that the needed variety of produce could be assembled every day. Weighing and grading are also to be carried out transparently in the presence of the farmers. Refrigerated trucks which ACFA believed will reduce losses will be used to convey the produce from the farms. In this way, they will be able to provide all necessary amenities and to manage the mental skills and quality administration so as to represent all co-operative farmers in the state and beyond. But the government needs to make friendly policy for the farmers so as to operate freely without deterrence from people who may not know what the end result of this program may result to.
The various governments Should strive to make use of ACFA in the instance that incentives or other kinds of benefit may be directed towards the farmers. With a calm and friendly environment created for the Association to operate, ACFA will be able to generate reasonable amount of money from the farmers to aid all faith strengthening programs of the government.

This will give an opportunity for the Association to assist the government to create employment opportunity for many youths and graduate who may not have opportunity to get a white collar job. We are sure that when reasonable numbers of youth are employed meaningfully will help to reduce youth restiveness, and curb rural urban migration.

Questions About Cooperative

QUESTIONS ABOUT CO-OPERATIVE.          Part One

After malfunction have been identified among cooperative societies, the need to simplify the terms and system designed to operate an efficient cooperative group have been designed by a cooperative aficionado Mr. Agbonlahor Osamuyi and Team. He is a man who is very well aware that to reach the heart of a learner, the lecture must be presented in the simple best language that the learner will understand.

To this end, this book “QUESTIONS ABOUT CO-OPERATIVE” has been designed.
The following questions are expected to attract the interest of the cooperator to the cooperative organization. It will also explain some salient points the cooperator would otherwise may have not understood. These questions are also to present cooperative system as ordinary way of life for the cooperator so that it won’t be difficult to adapt to any change that may present itself in the line of running the society.

Question 1What  Concept Is The Co-Operative Foundation Laid?
Answer: “The co-operative ideal is as old as human society. It is the idea of conflict and competition as a principle of economic progress that is new. The development of the ideal of co-operation in the nineteenth century can best be understood as an attempt to make explicit a principle which is inherent in the constitution of society but which had been forgotten in the turmoil and disintegration of rapid economic change.”

Question 2: Was There Anytime That The Process Of Cooperative Faced A Hitch?
Answer: From the 1760s onwards, there were experiments in co-operation across the UK such as the Fenwick Weavers shop in Scotland and the Hull corn mill. By the early 1830s there were around 300 co-operative societies in the UK. These co-operatives often ran into problems through giving credit or a lack of business experience. Sometimes they were unable to recruit new members to move the co-operative into a new generation.

Question 3: What Helped The Rochdale Pioneers To Succeed, After Learning About The Situation Others Prior To It Previously Faced?
Answer: Instead of the pioneers to be deterred by the hectic situations faced by others that previously existed, the Rochdale Pioneers rather learned from these experiences and ideas and used them to develop a model of co-operation that could be followed by others.
They made this period of early nineteenth century a time of new ideas and rapid change. Many People interested in the survival of cooperatives were writing about and discussing co-operation and how to develop a successful and sustainable co-operatives.

Among these optimistic cooperators are Robert Owen (1771 - 1858) who was latter known as the Father of  Co-operation and was also involved in the trade union movement, introducing infant education to the UK and in setting up co-operative communities. He is probably best known for his work at New Lanark in Scotland.

Another well known advocate of cooperative society is George Jacob Holyoake. (1817 - 1906) George Jacob Holyoake travelled the country during the 1830s talking about co-operation and Robert Owen’s ideas. Holyoake was a great advocate and propagandist for co-operation. His history of the Rochdale Pioneers “Self Help by the People” was published in 1857 and inspired others to follow and set up their own co-operatives.

Among these great supporters of cooperation is Dr William King (1786 - 1865) Dr William King was another advocate of co-operation, seeing it as a means for working people to improve their lives. From 1828 to 1830 King edited “The Co-operator”, sharing experiences and advising on the steps to establish a co-operative. The Rochdale Pioneers studied “The Co-operator” and recognized the importance of learning the lessons of the earlier failures as they developed the principles and practices that ensure their model of a co-operative society was successful.

Question 4: Why Was 1840s Called The Hungry Forties?
Answer: The 1840s were known as “The Hungry Forties” because the move from hand looms in homes to powered looms in factories during the industrial revolution which changed the lives of many working people in Rochdale. The weekly wage for weavers had fallen by half at least from the 1820s to the 1840s and was barely enough for them to survive on. Women’s wages were even lower and many people were only working two or three days a week.
Industrialization led to a rapid increase in the population of Rochdale. The cost of housing meant that workers lived in slums, often with one room for each family. The poorest families lived in basements, with little ventilation and light and with access only to polluted water. Food prices were very high and many shopkeepers added weights to the scales so that customers did not receive the amount of food they had bought. Food adulteration was common, with water being added to milk, chalk being added to flour and gravel being mixed with oatmeal.
Working people had little control over their lives and were struggling to improve their living and working conditions by joining trade unions and campaigning for the vote. Elsewhere in Europe others were pioneering co-operative ideas to address poverty in rural areas. In Germany Friedrich Wilhelm Raiffeisen and Hermann Schulze-Delitzsch developed ideas that led to savings and credit co-operatives. In Slovakia Samuel Jurkovic established similar rural co-operative initiatives.
Question 5: Why are we sure that the Rochdale equitable pioneer cooperative was formed by workers in the weaver’s shop?
Answer: The 1840s were a bitter decade in Rochdale and many other parts of Europe, associated with poverty, hunger, and unemployment. No group was more desperate than weavers. However, the role of weavers in setting up the Rochdale Pioneers has been exaggerated by many casual writers. A close reading of the founding documents shows that weavers made up a large proportion of the first list of subscribers who supported the creation of the Pioneers. However, by the time of the founding meeting on 15 August 1844, many of the weavers had dropped out—perhaps because they were too desperate or too destitute to invest time or money in a co-operative venture.

Question 6: What Steps Were Taken To Quench The Unpalatable Situation?
Answer: In August 1844, a group of Rochdale workers after weighing the situation and knowing that if urgent step is not taken, things may get from bad to worse for them. Hence, they met to form a co-operative society. The 28 original members saw co-operation as the best way forward to give ordinary people control over their own business. They therefore resolved that to succeed, all members must having an equal share in the decision making and receiving a fair share of the profits by paying part of the investment of the business of the group, and also participating effectively for the success of the business. After meeting up with their individual expectation to be part of the business they named their co-operative ‘The Rochdale Society* of Equitable Pioneers’

*The Rule Book of the Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers was written by Charles Howarth and includes the Objects of the Society as its “Law First”. They were setting out to improve both the financial and social conditions for members. The objects include the setting up of a shop, the building of houses, manufacturing, farming and a Temperance Hotel – to provide an alternative to the public house, which was the only meeting place for working people at the time. The ultimate aim was to change all production, distribution, education and government to co-operation. They knew that a world based around co-operation would be a much fairer place. All members would be able to buy good food at reasonable prices, to be part owners of the Society, take part in the decision making about how it would operate and receive a fair share of the profits. In addition, they would have access to libraries and educational classes which were normally only open to the rich.
Question 7: How do the founding fathers define co-operative society?
Answer: Co-operative society was defined an autonomous association of persons who became united, and willingly volunteer to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically controlled enterprise.

Question 8: What value do the Rochdale Cooperative set for the movement?
Answer: The founding fathers based the Co-operatives values on the principles of self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and solidarity. Therefore every co-operative members are expected to operate in the ethical values of honesty, openness, social responsibility, and caring for others
Question 8: What Class Of Persons Actually Came Together To Establish The Rochdale  Pioneer Cooperative Society?
Answer: The labourers who organized the Rochdale Pioneers, 150 years ago, were people suffering from the social dislocations of the industrial revolution. They struggled to survive periodic unemployment, low pay, unhealthy cities, and dangerous workplaces. They had no social benefits—no insurance or health care or pensions from their employers or from the state. They were dependent on merchants who were sometimes unscrupulous, who exploited the helplessness of the poor by selling at high prices, by adulterating goods, or by trapping them with offers of credit. And the Rochdale labourers faced these challenges in a time and place when they had no vote, no democratically elected government to represent them, no interventionist state to protect them. Their answer to daunting social problems was a special kind of self-help: mutual self-help, in which they would help themselves by helping each other. It was a small start to a large international movement.
Question 10: Why do we conclude that cooperative society, mostly the farmers cooperatives are for those in the grass-root?
Answer: The founders of Rochdale were of course poor compared to their social superiors. They lacked real economic or political power, or high social status. And the poverty and misery surrounding them in Rochdale were undoubtedly a large part of their motivation for creating a co-operative. It is, therefore, reasonable to say that the forces of poverty and need inspired the formation of the Rochdale co-operative. But they did so somewhat indirectly, mediated by the agency of idealism and critical social thought, and by the activists of Owenism, Chartism, and other social movements. The Rochdale Pioneers did not rise spontaneously from need, but were organized consciously by thinkers, activists, and leaders who functioned within a network of ideas and institutions. The same can probably be said of all successful co-operatives in all times and places: they arise from need—when some activists, institutions, or agencies consciously promote and organize them. Also, while co-operatives have frequently been tools for the relatively poor or marginalized, there is evidence that (just as in Rochdale) they are rarely led by the very poorest.
The founders sorts for a mutual self-help organization that would advance their cause and serve their social objectives through concrete economic action. They called their new association the Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers, a name that rang with overtones of Owenism. “Equitable” had been one of Robert Owen’s favourite words—as in his plan for Equitable Labour Exchanges that would allow workers to exchange goods and services directly with each other, bypassing employers and middlemen. To Owenites, “Equitable” signified a society that would eliminate capitalist-style exploitation, and that would exchange goods and reward labour fairly according to Owen’s ideas. The word “Pioneers” might have been inspired by the newspaper The Pioneer, which had been the organ first of the Operative Builders’ Union, an early trade union, and later of Owen’s Grand National Consolidated Trades Union. To choose a name like “Equitable Pioneers” in 1844 was a social and even political statement, and 6 Bonner (1961), p. 45, discusses these questions concisely. See also Cole (1944), pp. 59-60. 7 Bonner (1961), p. 45. The Meaning of Rochdale 5 implied that the Pioneers were consciously taking a place in the movement for social reform and the advancement of the working class and its interests.

Question 11: Why Do The Rochdale Pioneers Prefer To Open A Business Shop?
Answer: They preferred to open the shop because the members of the Society needed to raise money to start their store and they collected 2d or 3d a week from each member. With a loan from the Weavers Association, they were able to collect £28 and they were ready to start in business.
Private shopkeepers were worried by the idea of working people setting up their own store, so it was difficult for the Pioneers to find a shop. Eventually, Dr Dunlop, a local property owner, agreed to rent them the ground floor of 31 Toad Lane. The building had been a woollen warehouse and as part of the agreement, the Pioneers had to replace the large doors with a shop door and windows.
Question 12: Why is Dec 21st Considered As The Birth-Date Of International Cooperative Movement?
Answer: The Rochdale Pioneers admitted unlimited numbers of members and distributed part of the co-operative's profits as a dividend on purchases. With 28 members they started not the first, but the first successful co-operative enterprise, the Rochdale Equitable Pioneer Society at their shop in Toad Lane Rochdale, now the Rochdale Pioneers Museum. They began trading on 21 December 1844, the date now recognized as the birth-date of the International Co-operative Movement.
Question 13: What Are Some Qualities That Enhanced The Success Of Rochdale Pioneers?
Answer: The Rochdale Pioneers began in a very modest way. They sold the basic necessities of life to their members, butter, candles, soap, flour and blankets. Their aim was to supply good quality goods, cheaply and to return any profit to members of the co-operative. Where the Rochdale Equitable Pioneers succeeded was that, from their own harsh experience of poverty and the theories of Owen and King they worked out that to succeed, their co-operative enterprise must work on a number of key principles which are now recognized internationally as the Seven Co-operative Principles.
Question 14: What Achievements Were Recorded 26 Years Later By The Rochdale Pioneers?
Answer: The success of the Rochdale Pioneers was remarkable. For instance:
1.      By the 1870's the co-operative movement had its own wholesale and insurance societies
2.      They were able declare capital of over £300,000.
3.      Today, despite intense competition in food retailing, UK retail co-operatives still have a total turnover of over £7.7 billion and there is a renaissance of interest in all forms of co-operative.

Question 15: What Led To The Setting Up Of The International Co-Operative Alliance?
Answer: With these achievement in view, the co-operative movement spread rapidly, by the end of the last century it was already an international movement. The International Co-operative Alliance was founded and held its first congress in Manchester in 1896. Today the Co-operative Principles are successfully applied throughout the world to a vast array of co-operative enterprises, farming co-operatives, fishing co-operatives, credit unions, retail co-operatives, manufacturing co-operatives, even co-operatives providing internet access services.

Question 16: What Situation Did the Laborers Who Formed the Rochdale Equitable Pioneer Cooperative Faced that motivated them to be determined to succeed in their Venture?
Answer: The labourers who organized the Rochdale Pioneers, 150 years ago, were people that suffered from the social dislocations of the industrial revolution of their time. They struggled to survive intervallic unemployment, low income, unhealthy cities, and dangerous workplaces. They had no social benefits—no insurance or health care not to mention about pensions from their employers or from the state. They were dependent on merchants who were sometimes deceitful, because at any privilege, they exploited the helplessness of the poor by selling at high prices, they even adulterate the goods. Because they want to use them as slaves, they systematically entrap them with offers of credit.
The Rochdale labourers faced these challenges in a time and place when they had no vote, no democratically elected government to represent them, no interventionist state to protect them. Their answer to daunting social problems was a special kind of self-help: mutual self-help, in which they would help themselves by helping each other. It was a small start to a large international movement.

Question 17: What was Rochdale Known For, and what eventually happened precisely in the early 19th  century? Explain
Answer: Rochdale was a textile-based manufacturing town whose chief industry was in decline due to the industrial revolution. For centuries Rochdale had been a centre for the manufacture of flannel; but in the early decades of the nineteenth century, handloom weavers faced competition from the power loom and lost markets due to American tariff policies. Discontent in Rochdale centred among the weavers. There was repeated labour unrest, including violent strikes in 1808 and 1829. After the first of these incidents, troops were stationed near Rochdale until 1846.

Question 18: How Were The Founders Of Rochdale Able To Turn Their Poverty To Wealth?
Answer: The people that founded Rochdale were of course, poor people compared to their social superiors. They lacked real economic or political power, or high social status. And the poverty and misery surrounding them in Rochdale were undoubtedly a large part of their motivation for creating a co-operative. It is, therefore, reasonable to say that the forces of poverty and need inspired the formation of the Rochdale co-operative. But they did so somewhat indirectly, mediated by the agency of idealism and critical social thought, and by the activists of Owenism, Chartism, and other social movements. The Rochdale Pioneers did not rise spontaneously from need, but were organized consciously by thinkers, activists, and leaders who functioned within a network of ideas and institutions. The same can probably be said of all successful co-operatives in all times and places: they arise from need—when some activists, institutions, or agencies consciously promote and organize them. Also, while co-operatives have frequently been tools for the relatively poor or marginalized, there is evidence that (just as in Rochdale) they are rarely led by the very poorest.

Question 19: What Actually Make Rochdale Unique?
Answer: What gives Rochdale a unique place in the history of the co-operative movement is the set of principles derived by the founders to govern their affairs as a society. The individual ideas had been tried before in earlier co-operative experiments. The originality of the Rochdale society lay, in part at least, in the combination of these principles into a single unified whole:
  • democratic control ("One Member, One Vote")
  • open membership
  • limited return on capital ("Labour Hires Capital")
  • distribution of surplus in proportion to a member's contribution to the society
  • cash trading only
  • selling only pure, unadulterated goods
  • providing for the education of members in co-operative principles
  • political and religious neutrality

Question 20: How is Rochdale Today, And Why Would You Want To Emulate Them?
Answer: The co-op occupied the Toad Lane premises for twenty-three years. In 1867, the co-op moved down the lane into a four floor department store which the members had built to house their thriving business. The little store became a private shop. But as the power of cooperation grew, people coming to Rochdale from all over the world would inquire about the store which had given birth to modern cooperation. When they were shown 31 Toad Lane, they saw not the "Birthplace of Cooperation," but a shoddy little shop selling canaries and bird seed. At the 1914 Cooperative Congress it was therefore resolved to raise subscriptions to buy the building. Unfortunately, World War I impeded the campaign.
By the 1920s, enough money had been raised to buy the shop. The Cooperative Union and the Cooperative Wholesale Society drew up plans to restore the building to its original appearance, and the shop was officially opened as a museum in 1931. Between 1974 and 1978, the museum was closed to allow for extensive renovations and structural changes. The building is now in excellent condition. The renovated building and the Toad Lane Conservation Area was dedicated by Princess Alexandra on 13 May 1981. Along with the building next door, the short street is a well maintained attraction and one of the most visited sites in Rochdale's history.
The front room of the first floor of the museum depicts the simplicity of the original store with its meager supply of the shop's first few products: sugar, butter, flour, oatmeal, and tallow candles. Nearby are the benches where members waited to be served, the scale where their purchases were weighed, and the desk where their purchases were entered into the books of the cooperative. The rear room of the first floor depicts the history of the Rochdale Pioneers and the early leaders of the cooperative movement.
Originally a school and a chapel, which the co-op took over in 1848, were located upstairs. The co-op operated a library and classroom on the first floor, and a drapery and shoe repair service on the third floor. When the building was remodeled extensively in the 1970s, it was decided that the museum would be structurally safer if the third floor was removed. As a result, the second floor of the museum is a lofty and well lit meeting and exhibition hall. Around the walls hang many historical banners and photographs.
Rochdale is the mecca of any co-op pilgrim. To open the door and enter into the tiny shop where the modern cooperative movement began is a never to be forgotten experience for any co-op activist.
The original Rochdale Equitable Pioneers Society merged with the Oldham Cooperative Society in 1976 and then was absorbed into the Norwest Cooperative Society in 1982. A further merger made the co-op part of United Cooperatives. In 1989, the name of the Rochdale Equitable Pioneers Society was re-registered to revive the society as a supportive and promotional organization on behalf of the Pioneers Museum in Rochdale.
As farmers cooperatives there are lot of benefits to derive from the determination and zealousness of the shoe makers, watchmen, cabinet makers and like-minds the founders/pioneers of Rochdale Equitable Pioneers Cooperative that effectively and efficiently dedicate their time, effort and finance including their convenience to make sure cooperative strive around the world today.
All Cooperative Farmers Association affiliate members should endeavour to challenge themselves to become the prototype cooperative organization that will change the operations and pattern of management in the system in the state and the nation in-general.
Therefore all acfarian should take it as a challenge to succeed in this undertaking. And to effective achieve success; they must exhibit good quality of togetherness which entail love, sincerity, transparency, respect, truthfulness, most importantly the quality of continuity which aid the people and the organization to sustainability.
Our main tool shall be: 

Questions About Cooperative ...... introduction

INTRODUCTION
It is necessary to let intending cooperators know that what they are going into is a real business and that they should treat it accordingly. But what we experience presently in the system of setting up and running cooperative is a group of persons who have been told by friends and colleagues that all it takes to benefit from government and other kind of loans is just to get themselves registered as a cooperative society. These newcomers will go as far as borrowing money in order to register the group.
During registration of cooperative society, the officers, including the registrar and Director of cooperative does not care to interview these  beginner, recognizing that they are ignorant of the real method of operating the cooperative movement, automatically find themselves in the cooperative labour market (sorting for free/easy money that they may never find).
Imaging the kind of shock they will experience, finding out that just registering a cooperative does not entitle them to benefit from government incentive, including loan and grants. Expected result is reversion. That’s going back to nothing as they may not be patience enough to actually get help as a real cooperative.
Realistically, the cooperative officers or any agent approved by the ministry to conduct formal sensitization for new cooperators were presumed to tutor the new cooperator towards understanding the fact and reality, the difference between the corporate establishment and the cooperative society.
For instance any force man that does not pass through incentive training, may easily become a prey to the opponent in the case that there is a chaos. Hence proper training is needed. Likewise the cooperative movement. If a cooperator is not given the required orientation, he may easily fall away when his plans of becoming a member of the group which is joining to get money is not realized.
This book “A SUCCESSFUL COOPERATOR” has been designed as a question and answer document expected to aid all members of existing or new cooperatives to excel in the business of cooperating together to achieve their common goals.




The writer
Agbonlahor .O. Osakue
Professor of creative Ideology


Questions About Cooperative ...... preface

PREFACE
The start of the 19th century in the UK was an age of child labour, exploitation and poverty. Persons who failed to find work in the new factories were forced to rely on meager parish relief for the poor or to remain in hunger. By the early 1800's, food prices became very high and workers that were privileged to find employment, discover that their wages were reduced. Much of the population suffered extreme poverty and deprivation.
The prevailing economic philosophy of the time was the capitalist free-market philosophy of Adam Smith, who claimed that through the impersonal mechanism of the free market, self-interest would automatically lead to public good. Adam Smith took for granted in his book "The Wealth of Nations" that this market economy was one in which human relations were reduced to the buying and selling of labour and that workers could never improve their lot through industrial or political action.
Labour, and the poverty including the starvation that goes with unemployment, was simply a market commodity subject to the free market rules of supply and demand. Added to this were the population theories of the Reverend Thomas Malthus, which suggested that any attempt to help the poor would simply increase the population and make matters worse. These individualist theories removed any incentive from those with wealth and power to seek to improve the conditions of the majority who were poor.
There were however, a small number of enlightened individuals appalled by the poverty and ill health of the poor who had an alternative vision. Two of these enlightened individuals are now seen as the founders of the co-operative philosophy that eventually underpinned the development of the international co-operative movement. These two enlightened individuals were a wealthy industrialist, Robert Owen, and a Brighton medical practitioner, Dr William King.
            Their thought was, how can the worker break out of this trap? ”act of inhumanity done to them” fact for exoneration we the grass-root farmers must recognize is that without labour, capital is nothing; it only helps to stored labour and cannot begin to work until the worker makes use of it. Why then cannot the worker take all the value of the product? Because while he or she is working to make the goods, the worker must live, and so the capitalist advances capital in order to keep the worker alive. But supposing the worker had enough capital to do this, then the product would all go to the worker. The key is to store up enough capital to get control over our own labour, and then, possessing both labour and capital, we will be able to do without the capitalist altogether. But individual workers cannot do this on their own; there is too much risk, the process of accumulating enough capital takes too long, and if we become ill or grow old there is nothing to fall back on. But together, if we learn to co-operate, we can do it. This was the basis that the cooperative society was founded on. “A ROCK BASE”

Monday 17 February 2014

Why Is Co-operative Society Not Doing Well In Edo State?



ADVANTAGES OF COOPERATIVES
       Coming together to operate a joint business is a difficult task to be taken by the people. Sincerely, the intentions of persons that make up the various co-operative operating in the state was that they will collect themselves together and borrow money whish is to be shared among themselves.
But the actual purpose of setting up cooperatives is far from that. there are lots of knowledge and basic information's and education every intending cooperators must posses/acquire 
If the standard set out to operate a co-operative is really applied, cooperatives have the following advantages.

  1. Cooperatives are inherently just enterprises: they broaden the base of property ownership and distribution of wealth. This is particularly important for creating democratic institutions and true political equality. Otherwise, those who have the wealth control access to resources, the media, and political power, which acts to corrupt democracy.
  2. Cooperatives have demonstrated that they can outperform comparable private sector firms if they have access to sufficient means of production — i.e., capital, labor, and entrepreneurial and managerial talent. Productivity increases for two reasons. First, workers have greater motivation and morale because of greater individual rewards and because of elimination of the conflict between labor and management. Second, there is greater flow and use of information concerning production efficiency and there is greater scope to bring forward and use workers’ insights for improving production.
  3. Cooperatives enhance worker satisfaction and job fulfillment because of participation in decision-making, equitable sharing of profits, greater opportunity for self-expression and dignity, and an environment of mutual respect and social equity.
Cooperatives are one component of what is known as "psycho-economy", a branch of economics recognized in PROUT that is concerned (among other things) with increasing the psychic rewards of individual and collective work activity.
  1. Cooperatives provide greater job security than private enterprise. In cooperatives, when it becomes necessary to cut back on production, workers are not immediately fired or laid off. Cooperative members can collectively arrange to reduce work hours or wages in order to maintain the employment of all members of the enterprise.
  2. Cooperatives are one component of PROUT’s economic system that contributes to local control of the economy. Worker-controlled businesses stay where workers live and are locally owned. This eliminates problems of outside ownership and of profits flowing out of the local economy to outside owners, as occurs in capitalist economies.